This is the machine, as found; and now affectionately known as "Ruby". Other than lots of dirt, lint and crumbly wiring, she doesn't look bad for her age at all.
1926 Singer 99 |
I want to keep this machine as original as possible, with the exception of the wiring. Wiring that is 80+ years old can be scary - brittle, crumbly, and exposed bare wires. All of those things can add up to a painfully dangerous shock, house fire, or worse. And being unable to test the machine's motor, I have to keep in mind that it may need replacing. So the first step was to photograph everything and from multiple angles and begin assessing what parts/materials I would need to restore this machine.
First things to add to the budget, electrical supplies - $30 for a potential motor replacement; $5-$10 for wiring/cords/soldering supplies/etc. I already had some wire left over from the previous machine's re-wire; I bought it in bulk to save on shipping. Somehow, I knew I would be going down this road again in the future. But I still want to account for it in the 'total cost' of refurbishment. It gives me a good idea of a machine's 'cost of ownership' should I decide to rescue another vintage machine. (And we all know given my current track record, there will be others. I'm perusing Craigslist now as I write this post.)
The internal wiring didn't look too bad on the surface. But, being cloth covered, looks can be deceiving. Upon deeper inspection, I found exposed wires where both the cloth and latex insulator had worn away, and on a few of the end connectors, the wires had broken into separate pieces.
On the surface, wiring 'looks' okay. But it is hard and non-flexible. It has survived past its lifespan. |
And just in case technology failed me, I made a hand drawing of the wiring to put away with my notes. And even though I back up my photos religiously, I still like tangible hard copies of some things, thus my diagram:
More disassembly to come in the next post.
7 comments:
Can't wait to see more!
I would really like to see Part 2 of this, as I have the exact machine and with the trouble of tracking down a cord with the two female ends I am wondering if it's possible to just wire a power cord in directly to the motor controller and forgo the detachable power cord.
looking forward to Part II!
Thaddaeus - I am working on part 2, life took a side-step recently and the hobbies took a back burner. I would not recommend wiring straight to the motor controller. You may have to switch to a 3-pin connector and wire your machine that way. Singer eventually went that direction with the 99's and dropped the 'double female' plug. I'll try and finish part 2 in the next few days.
Scott, thank you so much for putting these Singer 99 restoration pages up. I've just obtained a 1939 version of the same and your nice clear images are going to be a huge help.
Thank you again - all the best to you and yours (:
Scott, I refurbish sewing machine and have one exactly like this that I have cleaned and gotten operational. I loved that you posted how to rewire as this one is exactly like the one I have had to rewire. I am running into a problem, however, the motor and controller are staying warm. Very warm, not hot where it would burn you, but very warm. When I turn the hand wheel, the motor hums as if it would start moving if it could. I have rewired it exactly like you have shown, but it still seems as though the motor is still getting electricity even when the controller is not engaged. What are your suggestions??
On another note...I re-furbished one of these with the knee control, just like this one and the one I have, we couldn't find the cord to run from machine to outlet. The customer, who is very handy, made one by using a brass connector and some electric wire and a rubber sleeve. It looks great and works great!
Thanks,
Patsy Guerra
Where can I get a motor control module ??? #192213
I need one of the motor control models that fits inside the Brentwood Case. Knee bar controller #192213. Any help out there???? bevdonmc@msn.com
Post a Comment